Review of Critical Care Medicine

  • Blog Stats

    • 514,736 hits
  • Disclaimer

    The author does not take over any guarantee for the topicality, the correctness, completeness or quality of the information, made available. Liability claims against the author, concerning damage of idealistic or of material kind, which was caused by the use or not use of the presented information and/or by the use of incorrect and incomplete information, are in principle impossible, so far as not a deliberate or roughly negligent fault can be proved on the part of the author. The documents and graphics on this Web site can be affected by technical inaccuracies or misprints, for which we don't assume any liability. Furthermore,quotation from a book or the incidental capturing of copyrighted material in a segment of a MCQ should be considered as "FAIR USE".It is only for nonprofit educational purposes.The display is a regular part of the systematic instructional activities of this non-profit educational website and is meant entirely as help to solve the ever-challenging MCQs.Due respect has been given to great medical authors and their names displayed prominently alongside quotations/pictures or paragraphs.
  • Member of The Internet Defense League

  • Follow Review of Critical Care Medicine on WordPress.com
  • July 2010
    M T W T F S S
    « Jun   Aug »
     1234
    567891011
    12131415161718
    19202122232425
    262728293031  
  • Recommended Books

  • Webchat

Radiology

Posted by Dr KAMAL DEEP on July 25, 2010

 

anatomy_of_a_CT_scan

CT SCANNING:-

COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY
TECHNIQUE
The CT image is a cross-sectional representation of anatomy created
by a computer-generated analysis of the attenuation of x-ray beams
passed through a section of the body. As the x-ray beam, collimated to
the desired slice width, rotates around the patient, it passes through
selected regions in the body. X-rays that are not attenuated by the
body are detected by sensitive x-ray detectors aligned 180° from the
x-ray tube. A computer calculates a “back projection” image from
the 360° x-ray attenuation profile. Greater x-ray attenuation, e.g., as
caused by bone, results in areas of high “density,” while soft tissue

[Collimation The use of lead shutters to control the effective thickness of the
X-ray beam and thus the slice thickness. Prepatient collimation is next to
the X-ray tube. Positioning of the shutters requires high precision and accuracy
as the beam will diverge, thus the shutter collimation has to be less
than the nominal slice thickness. Prepatient collimation markedly affects
patient radiation dose. Postpatient collimation is next to the detectors. This
will reduce scatter and also controls the nominal slice thickness. Thinsection
CT can be more easily acquired with postpatient collimation, but
accurate alignment between pre- and postpatient collimation is required to
optimise radiation]

structures, which have poor attenuation of x-rays, are lower in density.
The resolution of an image depends on the radiation dose, the detector
size or collimation (slice thickness), the field of view, and the matrix
size of the display. A modern CT scanner is capable of obtaining
sections as thin as 0.5–1 mm with submillimeter resolution at a speed
of 0.5–1 s per rotation; complete studies of the brain can be completed
in 2–10 s.
Helical or multidetector CT (MDCT) is now standard in most radiology
departments. Continuous CT information is obtained while the
patient moves through the x-ray beam. In the helical scan mode, the
table moves continuously through the rotating x-ray beam, generating
a “helix” of information that can be reformatted into various slice
thicknesses. Single or multiple (from 4 to 256) detectors positioned
180 degrees to the x-ray source may result in multiple slices per revolution
of the beam around the patient. Advantages of MDCT include
shorter scan times, reduced patient and organ motion, and the ability
to acquire images dynamically during the infusion of intravenous contrast
that can be used to construct CT angiograms of vascular structures
and CT perfusion images.

polls_spiralCT_3949_676812_answer_3_xlarge

HELICAL CT SCANNING

 

CT scanning produces cross-sectional images of a patient rather than the conventional shadow images of conventional radiography. Figure I-23 schematically illustrates CT scanner operation. Confusing and distracting overlying structures are eliminated. In x-ray CT scanning, a fan x-ray beam from a source rotating about the patient passes through the patient, and the exit transmission intensity is monitored by a series of detectors. Spiral CT scanners move the patient through the x-ray beam while the tube continuously rotates around the patient. The x-ray beam “cuts a slice” about 10-mm thick through the patient. The transmission at any angle can be used to calculate the average attenuation coefficient along the length of the x-ray beam. By measurement of the transmission at many angles around the patient, a complex group of mathematical equations can be solved to calculate and determine the mass attenuation coefficient of small (about 1 × 1 × 10 mm) volume elements (voxels). The final cross-sectional image is then made up of a display of the gray scale value of every voxel. For historical reasons and convenience, the attenuation coefficients are reported in terms of Hounsfield units. In Hounsfield units, bone and other dense materials are +1,000, water is equal to 0, and air is equal to –1,000. CT scanning, like digital radiography, can separate spatial and contrast resolution.

Over the last decade, computed tomography has developed rapidly,from conventional, single-slice machines through helical (spiral)
CT to the current multidetector (multislice) scanners. A number of advances in hardware and software have enabled this: in particular,
the use of slip rings to allow the scanner gantry to rotate continuously in one direction; the development of X-ray tubes with great heat capacity for long continuous X-ray exposure (up to 60 s);

Three key advances enable CT data to be acquired continuously with on-going patient movement. These are slip-ring technology, precise patient table transport, and software reconstruction algorithms.

Slip-ring technology was the fundamental step that allowed volume data acquisition and was necessary for subsequent developments described below. In older (conventional) CT systems, there was an inherent delay of 3–5 seconds between each exposure. This arose from the physical need to have cables connecting the stationary gantry and the rotating X-ray tube, detector systems, and controls (tube–detector assembly). After 1–3 exposures, depending on the cable length and other factors, the cables became wound and rotation of the tube–detector assembly had to stop, change direction, and then unwind while further exposures were taken. Not only did this result in interrupted data acquisition but occasionally led to mechanical problems. Slip-ring technology brought about a major change. It abolished the physical need for the presence of an electrical cable between the ‘on the ground’ generator and the moving tube–detector assembly. Instead, power from the generator is connected to a large stationary ring. Other large rings that house the X-ray tube, detector systems, and controls move around within the stationary ring. Power is transmitted between the stationary and moving rings by means of brushes. Hence the scene is set for continuous X-ray rotation (rather than back and forth) and continuous data acquisition.

2. Interaction of electromagnetic radiation with matter
The detection of X-rays and gamma-rays depends on the interaction of their electromagnetic fields with matter. There are three forms of photon interaction with matter that are most important in nuclear medicine: photoelectric absorption, Compton scattering, and pair production.
In a photoelectric interaction, an atom absorbs all the energy of the incident photon. The photon ceases to exist but the energy is transferred to an inner-shell electron which is ejected and is then referred to as a photoelectron. This creates a vacancy in an orbital shell which eventually leads to the emission of a characteristic X-ray ( Fig. 6.1A ).photoelectric-effect
In a Compton interaction, a photon interacts with an orbital electron and loses some of its energy which is then transferred to the electron. The photon as a result is ‘scattered’ or deflected off in a new direction with a lower energy ( Fig. 6.1B ).

In pair production, high-energy photons interact with the electric field of a nucleus ( Fig. 6.1C ); the photon transfers its energy to create a positron and an electron. Since each particle has the rest mass of an electron, 0.511 MeV, this requires a minimum photon energy of 2 × 0.511 = 1.022 MeV. Radionuclides with photons exceeding 1.02 MeV are not generally used in nuclear medicine.

PHOTOELECTRIC—DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY

COMPTON-THERAPEUTIC RADIOLOGY

 

2.     ULTRASONOGRAPHY:-Ultrasound is generated by piezoelectric materials which have the property of changing thickness when a voltage is applied across them. Lead zirconate titanate (PZT) is the most widely used. The crystal is mounted in a conveniently shaped holder which contains the electrodes and any associated electronics, as well as the lenses and matching layers required to improve the beam shape (see later). The whole assembly is known as the probe or transducer, although strictly the latter term should be reserved for devices that change one form of energy into another, in this case electrical to acoustic energy.

High-frequency ultrasound gives good resolution because of its short wavelength, but the rapid attenuation of high-frequency ultrasound by tissue is the limiting factor to the maximum frequency that can be used in any given clinical application. Frequencies as high as 20 MHz can be used when only a few millimetres of tissue are to be traversed, such as for imaging the eye and skin and for intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). For superficial tissues, such as the thyroid, breast and scrotum, 7–15 MHz is appropriate. For the heart, abdomen and second and third trimester obstetrics, 3–7 MHz is optimal, while for some difficult applications, such as the abdomen in obese subjects, and for transcranial studies (most of which use Doppler), one has to resort to 1.5 or 2.5 MHz transducers. This frequency limitation is being reduced by the use of coded transmit pulses, which essentially impose a signature on the pulse (for example, by making its frequency slide upwards during the pulse, so called chirp encoding) so that the receiver circuitry can detect true echoes even when they are weaker than the noise floor.

INTERPRETATIVE PRINCIPLES
SHADOWING AND INCREASED THROUGH TRANSMISSION
Acoustic shadowing and increased through transmission of sound (often referred to as enhancement although this term is better reserved for the signal-augmenting effects of microbubble Contrast agents) are important components of the ultrasound image. Shadowing occurs when little or no ultrasound can penetrate an interface and results in a dark band over the deeper tissues, bounded by the ultrasound beam lines, which are parallel for a linear transducer and radiating for a sector transducer ( Fig. 3A.17 ).

Acoustic Shadowing

Absorption and reflection are the two main causes of shadowing. If a portion of the tissue being imaged absorbs ultrasound faster than the background, the chosen TGC(TIME-GAIN COMPENSATION) will be insufficient to compensate properly, and therefore tissues deeper to the highly attenuating region are undercorrected and appear darker than adjacent tissue. Fibrous tissue and, to a lesser extent, fat attenuate at a higher rate than the usual 1 dB MHz-1 cm-1 and are common causes of acoustic shadowing, for example in a fatty liver, behind scars and behind scirrhous breast carcinomas. High attenuation also partly accounts for the shadows seen deep to calcific lesions such as biliary and renal stones, but here intense reflection is also a factor. Whatever proportion of the incident ultrasound is reflected is not available to continue through for imaging. For stones this amounts to about 60% of the incident energy, but for tissue–gas interfaces almost all 100% of the incident ultrasound is reflected and these produce dense shadows. In this case, the shadows are often partially filled in by reverberant echoes, which form because of the efficiency of these gas–tissue boundaries as reflectors, so that reverberation artefacts commonly occur. The noise in gas shadows has given rise to their designation as ‘dirty shadows’ in stones, as compared to the ‘clean shadows’ behind stones, and this is sometimes a useful differential diagnostic feature.
Whether a stone or gas bubble actually casts a shadow depends on its size relative to the ultrasound beam width. A significant fraction (about three quarters) of the beam must be obstructed to cause a shadow. If a stone is smaller than this, or lies away from the central axis of the beam, enough ultrasound passes beside it to insonate the deeper tissues. In practice, shadowing is usually apparent behind renal and biliary stones of 5 mm or more in diameter, and much smaller calcifications may also shadow if high-resolution transducers are used. Groups of fine calcifications can also shadow if their aggregate size and density is high enough; for example, in nephrocalcinosis.

 

A third important type of shadowing, ‘edge shadows’, are sometimes known as ‘refractive shadows’, a description based on one explanation of their origin. They are seen as fine, dark lines extending deep to strongly curved surfaces and do not imply attenuation or strong reflections. Cysts and the fetal skull are typical examples and fascial sheaths are often also responsible, for example the fine shadows seen beyond Cooper’s ligaments in the breast and those caused by the neck of the gallbladder. These edge shadows must be recognized as being different from attenuating and reflective shadows to avoid errors in their interpretation.

Increased through transmission is the exact opposite of attenuation shadowing: here, a region of tissue has a lower than average attenuation and so the TGC (which is adjusted to compensate for the average attenuation) is inappropriately high for that region. Thus the echoes from deeper tissues are overamplified. The phenomenon is the hallmark of cystic spaces and the ‘bright up’ is often accentuated by the darker banding lines of the edge shadows typically formed from the cyst wall ( Fig. 3A.18 )

 

Increased Sound Transmission

Some solid tissues also show increased sound transmission, however, usually because they have a high proportion of fluid. Many tumours fall into this category, especially fibroadenomas in the breast, and lymphomatous deposits and inflammatory masses may behave in the same way. Even those fluid cavities that contain echogenic material, such as suspended crystals in the gallbladder, pus, blood or necrotic tissue, usually still produce increased transmission, depending largely on the proportion of fluid present.

 

ECHOGENICITY
The prime determinant of the strength of ultrasonic echoes is the impedance mismatch (Z) between adjacent tissue components. At the risk of being somewhat simplistic, in practical clinical terms this may be understood as interfaces between tissues of different densities. The larger the mismatch the stronger the echo, so that interfaces between soft tissues and bone, for example, give very strong echoes and, within soft tissues, the most significant components are fibrous tissue (often in the form of the perivascular microskeleton) and fatty tissue. Thus, while uniform regions of fibre or fat are echo-poor (subcutaneous fat and retroperitoneal fibrosis are examples), admixtures between them and watery tissues give stronger echoes.
A second important factor is the concentration of the scatterers: for a given impedance mismatch, a region that contains a large number of scatterers is more echogenic than one where they are spread out. Commonly, the ‘dilution’ of scatterers is caused by an increase in water content. The low reflectivity of the congested liver in right heart failure is an example. Malignant tumours are a general case: until they grow large enough to undergo necrosis or calcification (which produce new reflectors) they tend to be echo-poor ( Fig. 3A.19 ).

Echogenecity

 

Similarly, the oedematous tissues in acute inflammation give low-level echoes; examples include the echo-poor pancreas in acute pancreatitis and the segmental echo-poor regions of acute lobar nephronia in reflux nephropathy. On the other hand, the high concentration of reflectors is the cause of the echogenic kidneys in recessive (infantile) polycystic renal disease (the interfaces between the innumerable cysts cause strong echoes ( Fig. 3A.20 ));

PCKD ECHOGENECITY

strong echoes are also obtained from the multiple interfaces of the vessel walls of haemangiomas, and even stronger ones from angiomyolipomas, in which there is also admixed fatty tissue.

14 Responses to “Radiology”

  1. Joe said

    Have found this site very useful,thanks.

  2. Max said

    Well put together site,very informative.

  3. Jane said

    A very impressive blog,lots of useful information here.

  4. sam said

    Great to see all this information put together.

  5. stewart said

    Great post,full of valuable information.

  6. Paul said

    This is a really useful and well put together article.

  7. Kim said

    This is a well researched article full of valuable information.

  8. Its such as you read my mind! You appear to grasp so much about this, like you wrote the guide in it or something. I feel that you could do with some p.c. to force the message home a little bit, however other than that, that is fantastic blog. A great read. I will definitely be back.

  9. sue said

    So glad i found this site,it has been really helpful.

  10. sally said

    I found some really useful information on this site,cant wait to share it.

  11. Gaz said

    This is a really interesting post

  12. Moe said

    Really looking forward to your next article.

  13. Victor said

    Great and useful breakdown of information.

  14. Great list of information.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: